The Washington Post released information about Donald Trump to coincide with Wikileaks on Hillary Clinton.
WikiLeaks has posted a fifth batch of emails from Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta, with publisher Julian Assange saying the whistleblower organization has over 50,000 emails.
CIA analyst
According to former CIA analyst John Kiriakou, the release of the emails was intended to create a major shock wave in the US, but Assange ruined his own plan by being too open about it, as well as by publicly expressing his disdain for Hillary Clinton.
Kiriakou suggests that there is no coincidence that the Washington Post released information about the 2005 audiotape in which Donald Trump made misogynistic comments about women on October 7, around the same time as the first batch of Podesta emails was released by WikiLeaks. “He really was trying to make as big a political splash as he could,” said Kiriakou. “But at the same time, because he was so vocal about what his plans were, I think it allowed the Clinton campaign to make plans of their own.”
“He really was trying to make as big a political splash as he could,” Kiriakou told Radio Sputnik’s Brian Becker during a Loud & Clear broadcast. “But at the same time, because he was so vocal about what his plans were, I think it allowed the Clinton campaign to make plans of their own.”
Journalist Ben Norton added that it would be scandalous if it turned out that the timing of the Washington Post release was intended to downplay the impact of the emails, even before they came out, although there was no evidence that this is the case. Meanwhile, attempts by the former Secretary of State and the White House to blame the email hacks on Russia, in an attempt to distract the public’s attention from a substantive critique of the US government, foreign policy, or candidate Clinton herself, are obvious, he offered.
“What I think we can say is that there clearly is a concerted effort that was begun by the Clinton campaign and has since spread to other elements of society, including the government, blaming Russia for not just these leaks, but for really any problems the US has,” he said.
Support for Daesh
As for the content of the leaks, one email indicates that Clinton knew with certainty that both Saudi Arabia and Qatar, major US allies in the Middle East, were supporting Daesh. According to Kiriakou, although it may not be a direct form of support, the State Department and CIA are actively engaged, and, “at the very least it’s dishonest public diplomacy.”
Norton also cited excerpts of Hillary Clinton’s “compromised” speeches to Wall Street banks, included in some of the emails. Senator Bernie Sanders’ campaign demanded that Clinton release the text of the speeches, for which she was paid several million dollars in 2014, foreseeing that they would prove that, despite Clinton’s rhetoric, she was an ally of Wall Street.
“In these speeches she expresses support for Wall Street and…also admits she’s ‘far removed’ from the middle class,” Norton said. “In a speech to Goldman Sachs she lamented that there’s a so-called bias against successful people…She also claimed that it’s oversimplification to blame Wall Street and banks for the financial crisis.”
Kiriakou, who spent over 2 years in prison for exposing the CIA’s torture program, also emphasized that it is not just the content of the emails that is important, or whether it does any damage to the Clinton campaign. What is important, he suggests, is that people in power can get away with behaviors and actions for which mere citizens would be jailed, or worse.
