Future South Africa – Zuma’s Black South Africa

    51
    0
    SHARE
    Zuma Black South Africa
    Zuma Black South Africa

    Via e-mail

    In the midst of the political confusion that has gripped South Africa in recent days, with the cabinet reshuffle and downgrading of the South African Rand, many people are wondering if we have come to the end of South Africa.

    The answer is simple: the thing called an “end” does not exist, not in relation to a country. SA will be there long after Jacob Zuma is gone.

    However President Jacob Zuma is not going anywhere, anytime soon, he has once again emerged victorious after the ANC’s extended national working committee rejected the Integrity Commission’s recommendation for him to step down.

    Instead, deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa, ANC secretary general Gwede Mantashe and treasurer general Zweli Mkhize were forced to apologise to the Zuma for criticising him in public after his decision to remove finance minister Pravin Gordhan, his deputy Mcebisi Jonas and several other cabinet ministers and deputy ministers.

    What Zuma has done is to make us come to the realisation that South Africa (SA) is just another African country, not some exceptional country on the southern tip of the African continent.

    During the presidency of Nelson Mandela and Thabo Mbeki, some South African’s used to believe that the black people of SA are better than those of other African countries.

    South African’s must all thank Zuma for revealing their true African character; that the idea of rule of law is not part of who they are, and that constitutionalism is a concept far ahead of them as a people.

    How else are we to explain the thousands of people who flock to stadiums to clap hands for a president who has violated their country’s constitution?
    Such people have no idea of constitutionalism.

    Now that South African’s have reclaimed their place as another African country, they must reflect on and come to terms with their real character, and imagine what their future portends.

    In a typical African country, ordinary people don’t expect much of politicians, because people get tired of repeated empty promises.

    In a typical African country, people have no illusions about the unity of morality and governance. People know that those who have power have it for themselves and their friends and families.

    The idea that the state is an instrument for people’s development is a Western concept, and has been copied by pockets of Asian countries.

    Africans and their leaders don’t like to copy from the West. They are happy to remain African, and do things “the African way”.

    The African way is rule by kings, chiefs and indunas in a setting of unwritten rules. Is there anyone who has seen a book of African customary laws?

    The idea that a commoner can raise questions about public money spent on the residence of a king is not African. The ANC MPs who have been defending Zuma are true Africans.

    Asking a ruler to be accountable is a foreign – Western – idea. In a situation where there is conflict between a ruler and laws, Africans simply change the laws to protect the ruler. This is why no single white person has called for King Dalindyebo to be released from jail.

    The problem with clever blacks is that they think they live in Europe, where ideas of democracy have been refined over centuries.

    What we need to do is to come back to reality, and accept that SA is a typical African country. Such a return to reality will give us a fairly good idea of what SA’s future might look like…..

    SA will not look like Denmark. It might look like Nigeria, where anti-corruption crusaders are an oddity. Being an African country, SA will not look like Germany. SA might look like Kenya, where tribalism drives politics.

    People must not entertain the illusion that a day is coming when SA will look like the US. South Africa’s future is more on the side of Zimbabwe, where one ruler is more powerful than the rest of the population. Even if Julius Malema were to become president, it would still be the same.

    African leaders don’t like the idea of an educated populace, for clever people are difficult to govern. Mandela and Mbeki were themselves corrupted by Western education. (Admission: this columnist is also corrupted by such education.)

    Zuma remains African. His mentality is in line with Boko Haram. He is suspicious of educated people; what he calls “clever blacks”. Remember that Boko Haram means “Against Western Education”.

    The people who think South African’s have come to the end of SA don’t realise that South Africa has actually come to the beginning of a real African country, away from the Western illusions of exceptionalism. Those who are unsettled by this true African character need help. The best we can do for them is to ask them to look north of the Limpopo River, to learn more about governance in Africa.

    What makes most people restless about the future of SA is that they have Western models in mind, forgetting that ours is an African country.

    The idea that a president can resign simply because a court of law has delivered an adverse judgment is Western. Only the Prime Minister of Iceland does that; African rulers will never do that.

    Analyzed carefully, the notion of SA coming to an “end” is an expression of a Western value system – of accountability, political morality, reason, and so on.

    All these are lofty ideas of Socrates, Kant, Hegel, and so on. They are not African.

    All of us must thank Jacob Zuma for introducing us to the real African Republic of South Africa, not some outpost of European values.

    Via e-mail attributed to Prince Mashela from the Sowetan Times …

    Facebook Comments

    LEAVE A REPLY